Blog Layout

Palliative Wound Care

May 26, 2022

This document is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.  All information contained in this document is protected by copyright and remains the property of ProCare HospiceCare.  All rights reserved.


There are many types of chronic, non-healing wounds. These include pressure ulcers, diabetic ulcers, arterial insufficiency ulcers, venous ulcers, and malignant wounds.


Pressure ulcers are the most common type of wound we encounter as patients decline, become bed bound, and approach end-of-life. Stage 1 and 2 pressure ulcers cause superficial skin changes, and Stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers affect the deep tissue framework.¹ Pressure ulcers should be staged depending on damage and presence of certain characteristics. It is important to note that if a wound is healing, reverse staging is not done. If a patient has a stage 3 ulcer that is getting better, we would say that the patient has a “healing” stage 3 pressure ulcer.²


A patient’s initial assessment should include a review of their skin and existing wounds, if any, and an assessment of the risk factors that are affecting wound healing. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is one tool used when assessing patients. It is based on sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction/shear. Keep in mind, most tools used to predict risk do not account for end-of-life decline, so hospice/palliative care patients may be at greater risk than the scales show.³ Other risk factors for chronic non-healing wounds include obesity, tobacco use, vascular issues, diabetes, elderly, radiation therapy, poor self-care, alcohol use, and neurological issues. After the initial assessment, a plan should be developed that aligns with the patient and family’s goals. If there are emotional or spiritual issues that are contributing to poor self-care or alcohol/substance abuse, consider calling on other members of your multi-disciplinary team (i.e., social worker or clergy) for assistance. Therapy goals, which aim to improve quality of life, should be based on patient prognosis, patient factors, heal-ability of existing wound, type of wound, and patient and family wishes. Goals should include preventing new wounds or worsening of existing wounds, prevent/relieve distressing symptoms, reduce discomfort, reduce risk of infection, bleeding, and odor.³


The TIME mnemonic can help us improve wound care. 

If a wound has non-viable, deficient tissue, it may need to be debrided. However, stable eschar should be painted with Betadine® and never be debrided.¹²  There are many types of debridement techniques including mechanical, autolytic, enzymatic, sharps, surgical, and biologic.¹⁰ Many types of debridement are not appropriate and do not align with goals of care in hospice patients. There are some non-healable wounds that should NOT be debrided. These include arterial wounds in people with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) (stable dry gangrene, dry ischemic wound), wounds at risk for bleeding, malignant or inflammatory wounds, lower limb pressure ulcers if arterial insufficiency is present, and wound on patients who are acutely palliative.¹⁰   Most hospice patients have non-healable wounds that should only be debrided if necessary to manage bacterial burden, exudates, and odor.¹⁰


To promote health of the wound, moisture balance must be maintained. The correct dressing will help with this. Dressing choice is based on drainage, non-stick vs absorbent, as well as other factors. Dead space, undermining, and tunneling must be loosely packed or filled with an appropriate dressing. The table below shows the different dressing categories, examples, descriptions, and uses.

Re-evaluate the wound care plan within 2 weeks or if issues arise, or if there are changes in the patient’s condition or patient/family goals. Looking at the edge of the wounds aids in evaluation. Healthy wound edges are attached open and migrating/contracting. Non-healing edges don’t advance or are undermined. Improperly dressed wounds may get tunneling, undermining, and rolled edges. Keep in mind that some patients and family may have difficulty with compliance or procedures and need additional education and support. 


Possible wound complications include pain, bleeding, odor, and infection. Moistening dressings before removal, using non-stick dressings, and doing less frequent dressing changes can all help with pain. Using lidocaine 2% gel topically during wound care and/or pretreating with oral morphine or another oral narcotic 30-60 minutes prior to wound care can also help. For pain after dressing changes, consider applying a small amount of viscous lidocaine to the dressing side that contacts the wound. 


Malignant wounds are associated with a greater risk of bleeding than other types of wounds. If bleeding is anticipated, it should be discussed with the patient and family, and a plan should be in place. Dark basins, towels and bed linens (not red) can be used to minimize the impact of bleeding. Bleeding can be traumatic for the patient and family. Consider calling on other team members to help provide emotional support if needed. When a wound is at risk for bleeding, use gentle irrigation to cleanse the wound⁴ and stop anticoagulants including aspirin³. Avoid unnecessary dressing changes and debridement. Soak dressings with warm normal saline prior to removal if they adhere to the wound¹³ and use non-stick dressings⁴. If bleeding occurs, calcium alginate dressings can be placed on the wound and direct pressure should be applied for 10-15 minutes. If appropriate, the position can be changed or ice packs can be placed over the wound. Silver nitrate sticks can be used for small localized areas of bleeding. Minimize dressing changes (only changing the dressing if it is saturated with blood). If these methods don’t work, sometimes a sucralfate paste is used to help stop the bleeding.¹³


If wound odor is present, cleanse the wound, treat the cause if possible, and control infection.⁹ Crushed metronidazole (Flagyl®) tablets sprinkled over the wound with dressing changes is an off-label use, but can be effective at controlling odor at a reduced cost. If the wound is in an area where it is hard to sprinkle the crushed metronidazole, it can be mixed with a water-based lubricant and then applied to the wound. For deep tissue infection and odor, oral metronidazole can be used. Honey (Medihoney®) may also be effective for odor, wound pain, and debriding. If these options are ineffective, cadexomer iodine gel or an impregnated dressing (pad) is helpful for odor, beneficial for exudate, and also debrides.⁹ Aromatics can be used in the room to hide the odor. Adsorbents like charcoal (briquettes) or cat litter can be placed discreetly in the room. Baking soda may also be applied between dressing layers. Odor may cause embarrassment, shame, and result in patient isolation.⁹ Multidisciplinary team members can assist in supporting the patient emotionally and spiritually. Taking steps to control odor and talking about it with the patient/family and visitors before they arrive, can be helpful. Chewing spearmint gum, placing peppermint oil under the nose or using Vicks vapor rub can be helpful for the patient and visitors to hide the odor.


Wounds should be continuously assessed for local and systemic infection.¹² Wound swabs cannot diagnose an infection.² All wounds have contamination and many are colonized with bacteria. That does not mean there’s an active infection.¹² Wound cultures are not appropriate for most hospice patients. They can be very painful and are difficult to perform correctly and without contamination. The pus and necrotic tissue in a wound do not indicate the bacteria contained within the tissue. Also, once a culture is obtained, if not delivered to the lab within an hour, must be refrigerated.⁸ 


The NERDS and STONEES mnemonic is a useful tool to assess for superficial and deep infection.

Localized infections can be cleansed with topical antiseptics. Consider chlorhexidine, which has low toxicity, povidone-iodine (Betadine®) if broad spectrum is needed, and acetic acid (vinegar diluted 1:5 to 1:10) for suspected pseudomonas. Some topical antiseptics can interfere with wound healing. If the wound is healable, try to limit use and discontinue once infection has been controlled.⁸ After cleansing, topical antimicrobial agents can be used. Crushed metronidazole⁹ and cadexomer iodine that were used for odor, can also be used for localized infection. If these are not effective, silver dressing can be used for a short time, but it is a more expensive option and can cause tissue toxicity and resistance with longer use.⁸ 


Deep tissue infection may cause further systemic infections. Oral antibiotics can be used to treat systemic infections. The choice to use oral antibiotics depends on if the wound is healable, maintenance or non-healable, and the goals of care. If used, the goal is not to heal the wound, but to control the systemic infection. Expected bacteria in our hospice patients’ wounds are gram positive and negative bacteria including anaerobes. Dual oral therapy is used in order to address all of the different types of bacteria anticipated. The antibiotics used in order of preference are:

  • Amoxicillin/Clavulanate (Augmentin®), plus Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) (Bactrim®)
  • Clindamycin plus Ciprofloxacin
  • Doxycycline plus Metronidazole
  • TMP/SMX (Bactrim®) plus Metronidazole


In summary, it is important to do a thorough assessment of all patients for risk of developing chronic wounds and worsening of existing wounds. The main goal for wound care is to improve quality of life. Using the mnemonics TIME and NERDS & STONEES can help improve wound care. Oral antibiotics should only be considered for wounds with deep tissue or systemic infection, and in cases where treatment is preferred by the patient and family. Members of the multidisciplinary team can help support the patient and family and help increase the quality of life for patients with chronic wounds. 


Written by: Karen Bruestle-Wallace, PharmD, BCGP, RPh


References:

  1. Ayello, E. A. (2014, May 12). Pressure ulcer staging. Pressure Ulcer Staging Quality Initiatives. Retrieved January 14, 2022, from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/IRF-Quality-Reporting/Downloads/IRF-QRP-Training-%E2%80%93-PrU-Staging-May-12-2014-.pdf 
  2. Daley, B. J. (2021, April 3). Wound care. Wound Care. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/194018-overview#a5 
  3. Emmons, K. R., Dale, B., & Crouch, C. (2014). Palliative wound care, Part 2: Application of Principles. Home Healthcare Nurse, 32(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1097/nhh.0000000000000051 
  4. Ferris, F., & von Gunten, C. F. (2015, May). #46 Malignant wounds. Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.mypcnow.org/fast-fact/malignant-wounds/ 
  5. Ferris, F., & von Guten, C. F. (2015, May). Pressure ulcer management: Staging and prevention. Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin. Retrieved January 14, 2022, from https://www.mypcnow.org/fast-fact/pressure-ulcer-management-staging-and-prevention/ 
  6. Kulikov, P. (2018, December 25). Improving Wound Care Using the TIME Framework. The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1177&context=dnp 
  7. Nurses Association of Ontario, R. (2019). Project ECHO Skin and Wound Infection Enabler.pdf. Infection Control. Retrieved January 22, 2022, from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HdkywiJhQjZt4ObrPf60_rnfKLaScCqu/view 
  8. Nurses Association of Ontario, R. (Ed.). (2016, May). Assessment and Management of Pressure Injuries for the Interprofessional Team. Clinical Best Practices Guidelines. Retrieved January 20, 2022, from https://wound.echoontario.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/RNAO-2016-Pressure-Injury-BPG.pdf 
  9. Patel, B., & Cox-Hayley, D. (2015, August). #218 Managing Wound Odor. Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://www.mypcnow.org/fast-fact/managing-wound-odor/ 
  10. Regional Wound Care Program, S. (Ed.). (2015, April 6). Guideline and Procedures: Wound debridement. SWR Wound Care Program. Retrieved January 19, 2022, from https://swrwoundcareprogram.ca/Uploads/ContentDocuments/WoundDebridement.pdf 
  11. Tippett, A. (2018, April 12). The Use of Lidocaine in Managing Wounds. WoundSource Blog. Retrieved January 21, 2022, from https://www.woundsource.com/blog/use-lidocaine-in-managing-wounds 
  12. Vera, M. (2020, May 6). Wound Bed Preparation and Beyond. WoundSource. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from https://www.woundsource.com/blog/wound-bed-preparation-and-beyond 
  13. Winnipeg Regional, H. A. (Ed.). (2021, April). Malignant fungating wounds - WRHA professionals. Malignant Fungating Wounds, Clinical Practice Guidelines. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from https://professionals.wrha.mb.ca/old/extranet/eipt/files/EIPT-013-007.pdf 


By ProCare HospiceCare Team September 13, 2024
End-Stage Respiratory Disease
March 20, 2024
Oropharyngeal Considerations at End of Life
March 20, 2024
Treatment of Insomnia at End of Life
September 4, 2023
Fatigue is defined as a subjective feeling of tiredness, weakness, or lack of energy that can affect one’s physical, emotional, and cognitive state.
September 3, 2023
Pain is a common and debilitating symptom experienced in our hospice and palliative care patients.
August 1, 2023
By Meri Madison, PharmD, RP
By Meri Madison, PharmD, RPh June 12, 2023
By 2030, 1 in 5 Americans will be aged 65 and older and we can anticipate 52 million falls and 12 million fall injuries.
March 5, 2023
The presence of noisy respirations due to excessive secretions (also known as “gurgling” or “rattling”) at end of life predict a prognosis of days to weeks and can be alarming to family members.
By Meri Madison, PharmD, RPh February 15, 2023
When managing symptoms at end of life, it can be a struggle to find the most appropriate medications.
October 21, 2022
Renal impairment is relatively common in both the elderly and hospice patients, and it can affect the way medications act in the body in several ways. Most commonly, it results in decreased clearance of renally-excreted medications, leading to accumulation of the drug and/or its metabolites and subsequent adverse or toxic effects. The absorption of oral medications may be reduced in patients with renal impairment due to increased gastric pH and gut wall edema. Uremia caused by renal impairment can increase sensitivity to medications that act on the central nervous system (CNS), as well as increase the risk of hyperkalemia due to potassium-sparing drugs. In addition, uremia can enhance the potential for NSAID-induced edema or GI bleeding. Renal impairment can also lead to edema or ascites, cachexia, dehydration, decreased albumin levels and binding capacity, and decreased tissue binding, all of which can impact the effects of medications. To compensate for these renal impairment-induced changes in drug disposition, the typical actions taken regarding medication administration are to decrease the dose, increase the dosing interval, or a combination of the two. The action that would be recommended depends on the drug and its specific characteristics. There are many medications that require dose adjustment in renal impairment, but here we’ll be discussing just those that are most often seen in hospice. The goal is to make you aware of these common medications (and categories) that often need dose adjustment so they trigger a mental alert for possible follow-up if they are ordered for your patients with decreased renal function. Opioids: Many opioids can accumulate in renal impairment as the parent drug and/or metabolites. Tramadol has a maximum daily dose in all patients, but in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCL) less than 30 mL/minute, this maximum dose is reduced to 200 mg per day and the dosing interval should be extended to every 12 hours. Morphine renal dose reductions start with a CrCL less than 60 mL/minute, with possible extension of the dosing interval at this point as well. It is typically recommended to start considering alternatives to morphine in patients with a CrCL less than 30 mL/minute, and to avoid it altogether in patients with a CrCL less than 15 mL/minute. At end of life, the benefits of morphine can sometimes outweigh the risks. Because the presentation of renal accumulation-based adverse effects may be delayed, morphine can be used even in severe renal impairment or renal failure when the prognosis is hours to days, or in dialysis patients when death is imminent. Typically, oxycodone and hydromorphone are considered preferred alternatives to morphine in patients with significant renal impairment, although they both have metabolites that can accumulate in renal failure. As a result, the dose of oxycodone should be reduced and the dosing interval increased in patients with a CrCL less than 60 mL/minute, and oxycodone extended-release products should usually be avoided in patients with a CrCL less than 30 mL/minute. Hydromorphone dose reduction is also recommended when CrCL is less than 60 mL/minute; further dose reduction and extension of the dosing interval is recommended for hydromorphone when CrCL is less than 30 mL/minute. Although hydrocodone and its active metabolites may accumulate in renal impairment, there are no dose reductions for hydrocodone/acetaminophen according to the manufacturer’s labeling. Hydrocodone extended-release products (Hysingla ER®, Zohydro ER®) are rarely used in hospice, but dose reductions are recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Methadone and fentanyl patch are considered among the safest opioids in renal impairment because they do not have active metabolites. However, renal impairment can still alter how fentanyl moves in the body, so dose reduction is recommended in patients with a CrCL of 50 mL/minute or less. For methadone, dose reduction is not recommended until very severe renal impairment (CrCL less than 10 mL/minute). No dose reductions are recommended for buprenorphine at any degree of renal impairment, and it is generally considered safe in this population. NSAIDs: Examples of NSAIDs that are commonly used in hospice include ibuprofen (Advil®, Motrin®), naproxen (Aleve®), and meloxicam (Mobic®), and as mentioned previously, there are some concerns regarding the use of NSAIDs in renal impairment. According to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline, prolonged therapy with NSAIDs is not recommended if GFR is less than 60 mL/minute/1.73m² , and NSAIDs should typically be avoided in patients with a GFR less than 30 mL/minute/1.73m². As a general rule, NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest time possible in patients with renal impairment. In addition, NSAIDs should be avoided in patients with a high risk for developing acute kidney injury (e.g. volume depleted, elderly, and/or taking other nephrotoxic medications), and should be discontinued if acute kidney injury occurs during use. Antimicrobials: Many antimicrobials require dose reduction and/or extension of the dosing interval in renal impairment. Specific dosing recommendations depend on the antimicrobial in question and the type of infection being treated. When used for multiple doses, the dose of the antifungal fluconazole (Diflucan®) should be reduced in patients with a CrCL of 50 mL/minute or less. Examples of antibiotics commonly used in hospice that need dose adjustment include: sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim®); fluoroquinolone antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin (Cipro®) and levofloxacin (Levaquin®); certain penicillin antibiotics, such as amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanate (Augmentin®); and some cephalosporins, including cephalexin (Keflex®) and cefdinir (Omnicef®). Nitrofurantoin (Macrobid®, Macrodantin®) also has significant concerns in renal impairment. According to the manufacturer’s prescribing information, it is contraindicated in anuria, oliguria, or significant renal impairment (defined as a CrCL less than 60 mL/minute or clinically significant elevated serum creatinine). However, limited data suggest it is safe and effective for short-term use in patients with a CrCL of 30 to 60 mL/minute, although there appears to be an increased risk of pulmonary adverse events when eGFR is less than 50 mL/minute. In any case, nitrofurantoin should be avoided altogether in patients with a CrCL less than 30 mL/minute, due to the risk of pulmonary toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and peripheral neuropathy. Renal impairment can affect drug disposition in several ways, often increasing the risk of adverse and toxic effects. Whenever you have a patient with renal impairment, evaluate whether they are taking medications that may be cause for concern and require dose adjustment, and remember that hospice clinicians, pharmacists, and drug information resources can help by providing specific renal dosing recommendations. By Joelle K. Potts RPh, PharmD, BCGP REFERENCES: Aging and Kidney Disease. National Kidney Foundation. Available at: https://www.kidney.org/news/monthly/wkd_aging [accessed 8/8/2022] Aronoff GR, Bennett WM, Berns JS, Brier ME, Kasbekar N, Mueller BA, et al. Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure: Dosing Guidelines for Adults and Children. 5th American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA; 2007. Renal Impairment. Chapter in: Palliative Care Formulary, 7th Edition (PCF7). Wilcock A, Howard P, Charlesworth S, Eds. Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK. Chapter 17, added April 2017; 715-35. Drug monographs. Lexcomp Online, Lexi-Drugs Online. Waltham, MA: UpToDate, Inc. https://online.lexi.com. O’Connor NR, Corcoran AM. End-stage renal disease: symptom management and advance care planning. Am Fam Physician. 2012; 85(7): 705-10. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements. Jan 2013; 3(1). Available at: www.kidney-international.org Macrobid® Prescribing Information. Proctor and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Cincinnati, OH. Revised Jan 2009. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/020064s019lbl.pdf [accessed 6/13/2022] Macrodantin® Prescribing Information. Almatica Pharma Inc. Pine Brook, NJ. Revised Mar 2013. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/016620s072lbl.pdf [accessed 6/13/2022] 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2019 updated Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. JAGS. 2019; 00: 1-21
More Posts
Share by: